Ha - At first I thought you had made that up ET, but I see now it does come from the Fair Game website.
It would be interesting to know what data for us goes into that - possibly less reliable data than clubs that are formally signed up and/or higher up.
Personally, I would have thought the Financial Stability rating is a bit flattering (but maybe 6-months ago that looked a bit different).
Some of the other ratings might be a bit unfairly low but maybe it is an opportunity for the club to engage with Fair Game and understand more detail on why they are so poorly rated and take action. Perhaps even the Trust could ask the Club to follow it up?
I note that we are rated mid-table for NLS teams so not so bad relatively as it first looks.
The make up of the scores is explained on the website, multiple data points for each category. How much co- operation the club gave in providing data is something to be asked. You would expect that most clubs at our level would score quite lowly given financial resources and scale of clubs administration teams but clearly some clubs can score more highly than others with similar resources.